Release Notes:

1. Added subdivision option for orbital spheres (property boundaries in space).
2. Added accessory definition in the context of Enforcers who fail to report a known crime.
3. Added “willing to “Must be capable and willing to transfer member’s data…” for a CCL-RDL (Creative Common Law-Ready Distributed Ledger). This one is quite important since it iterates a substantial degree of ownership regarding personal data.
4. Clarified than an audit-warrant is required for one’s personal financial data to be viewed within a CCL-RDL.
5. Clarified that standard of financial fraud are evaluated according to latest version of US GAAP, so long as they don’t conflict with CCL.
6. Added “Data Ownership Policy” as list of required policies for any seller of goods/services.
7. Clarified the requirements for Adjudicator’s Policies and Procedures of Justice being publicly available.
8. Completely removed litigation from the dispute settlement process, and distinguished more clearly between mediation and arbitration.
9. Redefined “judge” in light of litigation modification (= an Adjudicator that presides over trials).
10. Changed time requirement for final result of jury trial after negotiations.
11. Required that the results of any jury trial must be made available to the public.
12. Clarified that an “Adjudicator” is simply a “lawyer,” and that the other kinds of adjudicators are subsets of this category (e.g., mediators, judges, etc.)
13. Clarified the conflict of interest between Enforcers and Adjudicators; for example, a person or corporate entity cannot co-own both at the same time, or be a member of both at the same time
14. Added an (important) policy that makes it illegal for Enforcers and Adjudicators to require third-party purchases from clients or potential clients. This prevents a world where health insurance, car insurance, and countless other good/services are used as a weapon against the general public, compelling them to purchase something in order to obtain (for example) legal representation or property-rights protection.
15. Similarly, if private Enforcers want to offer additional membership/identification records (e.g., ID card) besides the digital CCL-RDL record, this has to be free and without cost to the “consumer.” This obviously doesn’t entitle anyone to free property-rights protection, but only one’s record of being under CCL jurisidiction.
16. Clarified access to CCL-RDL records, including the requirement that any conditional access granted to a third-party government (e.g., intelligence or defense department) for the purposes of criminal investigation must itself be made publicly available within 30 days of issuance. (In other words, all CCL members must be able to know that a third-party government entity has accessed CCL records).
17. Added “blocking witnesses” an example of “obstruction of justice.”
18. Clarified uses of precedent, including exceptional cases for arbiters that involve the use of third-party law (cited internally to CCL Core).
19. Established rules for overruling precedent cases.