CCL Documents

CCL v 0-98

ccl icon

CCL Membership Contracts

Coming Soon!

CCL Modules

CCL Modules are “add-on” packages of legal code that are optional for CCL members. Such “mods” compromise the “polycentric” nature of CCL.

CCL Mods are only enforceable upon those who choose to be under their jurisdiction, and they are only enforced by those CCL Enforcers that agree to enforce them. Some are moral (ethical) while others are practical (e.g., “regulatory”).

Currently, the following modules are being drafted:

  1. Intellectual property inclusions (copyright, patents, etc.).
  2. Nuclear weapons restrictions (moderate; mainly on production).
  3. Nuclear weapons restrictions (strict; on both production and ownership of potential production materials).
  4. AI restrictions (mainly with relation to autonomous weapons-management).
  5. Air pollution restrictions (moderate; mainly fluorocarbons, arsenic, etc.).
  6. Air pollution restrictions (strict; CO2, methane, etc.)
  7. Animal rights (strict; applies to wide range of animals and allows no killing whatsoever)
  8. Animal rights (moderate; applies to larger/intelligent animals and allows conditional killing, because of recognized homesteading and property rights of animals, but conditioned upon those of human beings).
  9. Best practices of accounting
  10. Best practices of plumbing
  11. Best practices of electrical utilities

Drafts of each module are schedule to appear late 2020.

5 thoughts on “CCL Documents

  1. Avatar

    Shane Maness Reply

    In regard to this:
    4.1.3.1.1. Initiative (Force, 46 Duress, 47 Fraud 48 ).
    47…E.g., blackmail, extortion, holding gun to someone’s head and demanding that they injure another person, etc.
    Definition: “Blackmail” is a threat for purposes of compelling a person to do an act against his or her will, or for purposes of taking the person’s money
    or property.

    Would blackmail in the traditional sense (paying someone not to reveal damaging, but true, information) be coercive duress, as well?

    For this to be the case, then revealing damaging,but true, information about someone would have to be some sort of aggression, under the NAP.

    Can you clarify?

  2. CCL

    CCL Reply

    Well, I think that’s just it: the definition used right now is not “traditional” (not sure what you mean by this – I think you “in the popular sense”), so this theoretical situation isn’t much of an issue.

  3. Avatar

    Nathan Reply

    Is this project still active? And are the various drafts of the CCL Modules still slated to come out before the end of 2019? I have been watching this project with some interest, but there haven’t been any updates recently and I am curious if anything has happened.

    1. CCL

      CCL Reply

      Yes it is, updates forthcoming…

  4. Avatar

    Nathan Reply

    Regarding this:
    6.3.2.8. The biological mother of a Minor who was conceived due to involuntary action (i.e., rape) is exempt from all obligations of guardianship with respect to the Minor in question from the development of the first neuron to birth.[88]
    and:
    Footnote [88]. Clarification: In other words, the mother has the option to abort the minor, but if she chooses to give birth to the minor, guardianship becomes active (at or after individuation) and she must fulfill its obligations with respect to the born minor.

    I know that abortion, more than any other subject causes controversy in libertarian circles — gather three libertarians in a room and there will be at least four opinions present — and that you must have received much in the way of pestering requests for change on this subject, but I would still like to essay a minor suggestion (while leaving the general framework you have written unchanged).
    In cases of rape, the mother can abort the child up to the point of birth. Might I suggest that the mother cannot abort — but can (using the terminology of Walter Block) evict — the child at any point from her body? While I may not agree with Block’s Evictionism in consensual cases, for rape cases, it seems a better option than just straight abortion.

    Additionally, is there a way to donate to this project through more ‘normal’ — that is, without needing to use some cryptocurrency — means? I have enough interest in this project to seriously consider giving such small donations as I can afford, but I have had no experience dealing in cryptocurrencies.

Leave a Reply to Shane Maness Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *